Threads Editorial Research

Review public Threads posts to identify editorial patterns and possible follow-up topics.

v0.1.0

示例草稿 · 输入与输出 · 使用方法

示例草稿

Which posts deserve a closer editorial review?

Public sources: https://www.threads.net/@nasa, https://www.threads.net/@nasa/post/DfLnIF0F5Uo

运行结果节选

The Halloween crew post leads this 32-post snapshot; compare its format and context. NASA posts: 32 posts Median likes: 1798.5 likes Top post likes: 58018 likes Mixed post ages and thread parts; likes do not establish causation or reach.

Observed 2026-11-07T01:39:25.094Z. Mixed post ages and thread parts; likes do not establish causation or reach. The video summarizes this example; it is not a separate execution.

输入与输出

你提供

An account or topic and your editorial question.

你得到

An editorial brief with observed post patterns, engagement summaries and next steps.

使用方法

可读取完整 Skill 文件夹的 Agent。实时取数还需连接 SandBase;已有材料可以直接使用,无需额外查询。

下载并解压完整 Skill 文件夹,保留 references,交给支持 Skill 的本地 Agent。

下载 Skill v0.1.0

向 Agent 提出任务

使用 threads-editorial-research,根据我提供的材料完成任务:Review public Threads posts to identify editorial patterns and possible follow-up topics.